ASAs-
some of the areas that the GE needs to comment upon in relation
to the ASA's performance are:
Did
they arrive early?
Were
the members and guests greeted warmly?
Was the room well setup for the meeting?
Were the members name tags readily available?
Were guests encouraged to write their name in the guest book
and given an identifying name tag?
Was the introduction of guests and the apologies read out clearly
and distinctly?
Was the coffee etc made before the meeting and then brought
into the meeting room at the designated time, and removed after
the break with the least amount of disruption?
The
Chairman - comment on the manner in which the Chair has managed
the meeting:
Did the Chair made contact early enough for those who were taking
an active part in the meeting to be aware of what was expected
of them in their roles?
Is there a clear programme for all attendees to follow the progress
of the meeting?
Did the Chair use authority to keep the meeting on line and
call the meeting to order when appropriate?
Were there any dissenters who abused the time allowed to them
by going grossly over time and putting the timing of the overall
meeting in jeopardy?
Did the Chair link the speakers with appropriate comments?
Did the Chair create a warm and supportive atmosphere for the
meeting yet at the same time run it efficiently and finish it
on time.
The
Table Topics Evaluator - comment on the way the Table Topics
evaluator evaluated the Table Topics Master and speakers, using
the same guidelines as for a speech evaluation, but taking into
account the Table Topics Evaluator's limited time
The
Grammarian - comment on the challenge set by the Grammarian.
Was
it appropriate to give those who spoke the opportunity to include
the challenge in their speech?
Was the challenge well explained?
How well did the Grammarian report back in connection with this
challenge - were listening skills used?
The
Evaluators - it is necessary to comment on the Speech Evaluators
in the following way:
The
Introduction of the speaker - was this clear; were the speech
objectives (both manual and personal) stated; were previous
speeches mentioned to give a background to the speaker; was
the speech title mentioned and was the timing of the speech
given.
The
Evaluation of the speaker - did the evaluator provide positive
feedback; was the CRC (commend, recommend, commend) method used;
did the evaluation focus on how well the speaker met the stated
speech objectives - both manual and personal; were the recommendations
given with examples of how the speaker could improve future
speeches;
